2024 Volume 14 Issue 3
Article Contents

Nguyen Thi Thu Thuy, Nguyen Trung Nghia. SOME NOVEL INERTIAL BALL-RELAXED CQ ALGORITHMS FOR SOLVING THE SPLIT FEASIBILITY PROBLEM WITH MULTIPLE OUTPUT SETS[J]. Journal of Applied Analysis & Computation, 2024, 14(3): 1485-1507. doi: 10.11948/20230259
Citation: Nguyen Thi Thu Thuy, Nguyen Trung Nghia. SOME NOVEL INERTIAL BALL-RELAXED CQ ALGORITHMS FOR SOLVING THE SPLIT FEASIBILITY PROBLEM WITH MULTIPLE OUTPUT SETS[J]. Journal of Applied Analysis & Computation, 2024, 14(3): 1485-1507. doi: 10.11948/20230259

SOME NOVEL INERTIAL BALL-RELAXED CQ ALGORITHMS FOR SOLVING THE SPLIT FEASIBILITY PROBLEM WITH MULTIPLE OUTPUT SETS

  • The split feasibility problem with multiple output sets (SFPMOS) is a generalization of the well-known split feasibility problem (SFP), which has gained significant research attention due to its applications in theoretical and practical problems. However, the original CQ method for solving the SFP seems less efficient when the involved subsets are general convex sets since the method requires calculating projection onto the given sets directly. The relaxed CQ method was introduced to overcome this difficulty when the subsets are level sets of convex functions, where the projections onto the constructed half-spaces were used instead of the projections onto the original subsets. In this paper, we propose and investigate new algorithms for solving the SFPMOS when the involved subsets are given as the level sets of strongly convex functions. In this situation, we replace the half-spaces in the relaxed CQ method with balls constructed in each iteration. The algorithms are accelerated using the inertial technique and eliminate the need for calculating or estimating the norms of linear operators by employing self-adaptive step size criteria. We then analyze the strong convergence of the algorithms under some mild conditions. Some applications to the split feasibility problem are also reported. Finally, we present three numerical results, including an application to the LASSO problem with elastic net regularization, illustrating the better performance of our algorithms compared to the relevant ones.

    MSC: 47J25, 47J20, 49N45, 65J15
  • 加载中
  • [1] T. O. Alakoya, O. T. Mewomo and A. Gibali, Solving split inverse problems, Carpathian J. Math., 2023, 39(3), 583–603.

    Google Scholar

    [2] F. Alvarez and H. Attouch, An inertial proximal method for maximal monotone operators via discretization of a nonlinear oscillator with damping, Set-Valued Anal., 2001, 9, 3–11. doi: 10.1023/A:1011253113155

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [3] H. H. Bauschke and J. M. Borwein, On projection algorithms for solving convex feasibility problems, SIAM Rev., 1996, 38, 367–426. doi: 10.1137/S0036144593251710

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [4] H. H. Bauschke and P. L. Combettes, Convex Analysis and Monotone Operator Theory in Hilbert Spaces, 2011, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar

    [5] C. Byrne, Iterative oblique projection onto convex sets and the split feasibility problem, Inverse Probl., 2002, 18, 441–453. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/18/2/310

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [6] C. Byrne, A unified treatment of some iterative algorithms in signal processing and image reconstruction, Inverse Probl., 2004, 20, 103–120. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/20/1/006

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [7] Y. Censor and T. Elfving, A multiprojection algorithm using Bregman projections in a product space, Numer. Algorithms, 1994, 8, 221–239. doi: 10.1007/BF02142692

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [8] H. Cui and F. Wang, The split common fixed point problem with multiple output sets for demicontractive mappings, Optimization, 2023. DOI: 10.1080/02331934.2023.2181081.

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [9] T. L. Cuong, T. V. Anh and T. H. M Van, A self-adaptive step size algorithm for solving variational inequalities with the split feasibility problem with multiple output sets constraints, Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim., 2022, 43(9), 1009–1026. doi: 10.1080/01630563.2022.2071939

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [10] Y. H. Dai, Fast algorithms for projection on an ellipsoid, SIAM J. Optim., 2006, 16, 986–1006. doi: 10.1137/040613305

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [11] Y. Z. Dang, J. Sun and H. L. Xu, Inertial accelerated algorithms for solving a split feasibility problems, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 2017, 13, 1383–1394. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016078

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [12] M. Fukushima, A relaxed projection method for variational inequalities, Math. Program, 1986, 35, 58–70. doi: 10.1007/BF01589441

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [13] K. Goebel and S. Reich, Uniform Convexity, Hyperbolic Geometry, and Nonexpansive Mappings, 1984, Marcel Dekker, New York and Base.

    Google Scholar

    [14] S. He and C. Yang, Solving the variational inequality problem defined on intersection of finite level sets, Abstr. Appl. Anal., 2013, Article ID 942315.

    Google Scholar

    [15] T. Ling, X. Tong and L. Shi, Modified relaxed CQ methods for the split feasibility problems in Hilbert spaces with applications, J. Appl. Math. Comput., 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s12190-023-01875-7.

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [16] G. López, V. Martín-Márquez, F. Wang and H. K. Xu, Solving the split feasibility problem without prior knowledge of matrix norms, Inverse Probl., 2012, 28(8), 085004. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/28/8/085004

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [17] B. T. Polyak, Some methods of speeding up the convergence of iteration methods, USSR Comput. Math. Math. Phys., 1964, 4, 1–17.

    Google Scholar

    [18] S. Reich, M. T. Truong and T. N. H. Mai, The split feasibility problem with multiple output sets in Hilbert spaces, Optim. Lett., 2020, 14, 2335–2353. doi: 10.1007/s11590-020-01555-6

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [19] S. Reich and T. M. Tuyen, Two new self-adaptive algorithms for solving the split common null point problem with multiple output sets in Hilbert spaces, J. Fixed Point Theory Appl., 2021, 23, 1–19. doi: 10.1007/s11784-020-00835-z

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [20] S. Reich and T. M. Tuyen, Regularization methods for solving the split feasibility problem with multiple output sets in Hilbert spaces, Topol. Methods Nonlinear Anal., 2022, 60(2), 547–563.

    Google Scholar

    [21] S. Reich and T. M. Tuyen, Two new self-adaptive algorithms for solving the split feasibility problem in Hilbert space, Numerical Algorithms, 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s11075-023-01597-8.

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [22] S. Reich, T. M. Tuyen, N. T. T. Thuy and M. T. N. Ha, A new self-adaptive algorithm for solving the split common fixed point problem with multiple output sets in Hilbert spaces, Numer. Algorithms, 2022, 89, 1031–1047. doi: 10.1007/s11075-021-01144-3

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [23] F. Wang, The split feasibility problem with multiple output sets for demicontractive mappings, J. Optim. Theory Appl., 2022, 195(3), 837–853. doi: 10.1007/s10957-022-02096-x

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [24] Q. Yang, The relaxed CQ algorithm solving the split feasibility problem, Inverse Probl., 2004, 20(4), 1261–1266. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/20/4/014

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [25] H. Yu and F. Wang, A new relaxed method for the split feasibility problem in Hilbert spaces, Optimization, 2022. DOI: 10.1080/02331934.2022.2158036.

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [26] H. Yu, W. R. Zhan and F. H. Wang, The ball-relaxed CQ algorithms for the split feasibility problem, Optimization, 2018, 67, 1687–1699. doi: 10.1080/02331934.2018.1485677

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [27] H. Zou and T. Hastie, Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net, J. R. Stat. Soc. B., 2005, 67, 301–320. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00503.x

    CrossRef Google Scholar

Figures(1)  /  Tables(4)

Article Metrics

Article views(1111) PDF downloads(432) Cited by(0)

Access History

Other Articles By Authors

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint