Citation: | Eduard Musafirov. ADMISSIBLE PERTURBATIONS OF THE THREE-DIMENSIONAL HINDMARSH – ROSE NEURON MODEL[J]. Journal of Applied Analysis & Computation, 2023, 13(4): 1668-1678. doi: 10.11948/20210098 |
For the autonomous Hindmarsh – Rose system the set of admissibly perturbed nonautonomous systems have been obtained. Reflecting functions of the Hindmarsh – Rose system and admissibly perturbed system are coinciding. This allows to investigate the admissibly perturbed systems using outcomes of researches of the well-known Hindmarsh – Rose system and the theory of reflecting function. The results are illustrated by numerical examples.
[1] | R. Barrio, S. Ibáñez, L. Pérez and S. Serrano, Spike-adding structure in fold/hom bursters, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 2020, 83, 105100–1–15. |
[2] | I. Bashkirtseva, S. Fedotov, L. Ryashko and E. Slepukhina, Stochastic bifurcations and noise-induced chaos in 3d neuron model, Int. J. Bifurcation and Chaos, 2016, 26(12), 1630032–1–21. |
[3] | M. S. Belokurskii and A. K. Demenchuk, Periodic reflecting function of a nonlinear quasiperiodic differential system with a two-frequency basis, Diff. Eqs., 2013, 49(10), 1323–1327. |
[4] | V. A. Bel'skii, On quadratic differential systems with equal reflecting functions, Diff. Eqs., 2013, 49(12), 1639–1644. |
[5] | D. Chen, W. Zhao, X. Ma and R. Zhang, No-chattering sliding mode control chaos in Hindmarsh–Rose neurons with uncertain parameters, Comput. Math. Appl., 2011, 61(10), 3161–3171. |
[6] | J. M. Gonzàlez-Miranda, Complex bifurcation structures in the Hindmarsh–Rose neuron model, Int. J. Bifurcation and Chaos, 2007, 17(09), 3071–3083. |
[7] | J. L. Hindmarsh and R. M. Rose, A model of neuronal bursting using three coupled first order differential equations, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 1984, 221(1222), 87–102. |
[8] | M. A. Krasnosel'skiĭ, The Operator of Translation Along the Trajectories of Differential Equations, American Mathematical Society, Providence, 2007. |
[9] | W. Liu, Y. Pan and Z. Zhou, The research of periodic solutions of time-varying differential models, Int. J. Differ. Equ., 2014, 2014, 430951–1–6. |
[10] | S. V. Maiorovskaya, Quadratic systems with a linear reflecting function, Diff. Eqs., 2009, 45(2), 271–273. |
[11] | S. A. Malik and A. H. Mir, Synchronization of Hindmarsh Rose neurons, Neural Netw., 2020, 123, 372–380. |
[12] | V. I. Mironenko, Reflective Function and Periodic Solution of the Differential System, University Press, Minsk, 1986 (in Russian). |
[13] | V. I. Mironenko, Reflecting Function and Investigation of Multivariate Differential Systems, Gomel University Press, Gomel, 2004 (in Russian). |
[14] | V. I. Mironenko and V. V. Mironenko, How to construct equivalent differential systems, Appl. Math. Lett., 2009, 22(9), 1356–1359. |
[15] | E. Musafirov, Non-autonomously perturbed autonomous systems of ordinary differential equations, Dynam. Cont. Dis. Ser. B, 2022, 29(6), 447–454. |
[16] | E. Musafirov, A. Grin and A. Pranevich, Admissible perturbations of a generalized Langford system, Int. J. Bifurcation and Chaos, 2022, 32(03), 2250038. |
[17] | E. V. Musafirov, Simplicity of linear differential systems, Diff. Eqs., 2002, 38(4), 605–607. |
[18] | E. V. Musafirov, The reflecting function and the small parameter method, Appl. Math. Lett., 2008, 21(10), 1064–1068. |
[19] | E. V. Musafirov, Perturbations of the Lanford system which do not change the reflecting function, Int. J. Bifurcation and Chaos, 2017, 27(10), 1750154–1–5. |
[20] | E. V. Musafirov, Admissible perturbations of the Hindmarsh–Rose neuron model, Proc. Conf. Innovations in Technology and Education, Kuzbass State Technical University, Belovo, 2019, 317–318 (in Russian). |
[21] | E. V. Musafirov, Admissible perturbations of the Lorenz-84 climate model, Int. J. Bifurcation and Chaos, 2019, 29(06), 1950080–1–8. |
[22] | S. Nikolov, An alternative bifurcation analysis of the Rose–Hindmarsh model, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 2005, 23(5), 1643–1649. |
[23] | P. C. Rech, Dynamics of a neuron model in different two-dimensional parameter-spaces, Phys. Lett. A, 2011, 375(12), 1461–1464. |
[24] | M. Storace, D. Linaro and E. de Lange, The Hindmarsh–Rose neuron model: bifurcation analysis and piecewise-linear approximations, Chaos, 2008, 18(3), 033128–1–10. |
[25] | E. V. Varenikova, Reflecting function and solutions of two-point boundary value problems for nonautonomous two-dimensional differential systems, Diff. Eqs., 2012, 48(1), 147–152. |
[26] | X. Wang, Genesis of bursting oscillations in the Hindmarsh–Rose model and homoclinicity to a chaotic saddle, Phys. D, 1993, 62(1), 263–274. |
[27] | Z. Wang and X. Shi, Chaotic bursting lag synchronization of Hindmarsh–Rose system via a single controller, Appl. Math. Comput., 2009, 215(3), 1091–1097. |
[28] | Wolfram Research, Inc., Mathematica, Version 11.1. Champaign, IL, 2017. |
[29] | J. Zhou, The differential systems with the same reflecting function, Appl. Math. Comput., 2011, 218(7), 3144–3148. |
[30] | Z. Zhou, F. Mao and Y. Yan, Research on the Poincaré center-focus problem of some cubic differential systems by using a new method, Adv. Diff. Equ., 2017, 2017(1), 52–1–14. |
Bifurcation diagram of the system (2.2) depicting local maxima
Periodic attractors of the system (2.2) for
Bifurcation diagram of the system (2.2) depicting local maxima
Bifurcation diagram of the system (2.2) depicting local maxima
Solution of the systems (2.1) and (2.3) (left and right respectively) in the phase space.
Phase planes projections of the solution of the systems (2.1) and (2.3) (top and bottom rows respectively).
Solution components of the system (2.1) and (2.3) (top and bottom rows respectively).